British brand History Of Ball Watches Replica recently launched a limited-edition pilot chronograph. It’s not just any run-of-the-mill chronograph, however, but a hand-wound monopusher chronograph, and in true Christopher Ward fashion, they have managed to do it for a price point that’ll make you look twice, for the right reasons. Let’s take a look at the Christopher Ward C9 Me 109 Single Pusher Chronograph.
While most of the name is pretty self-explanatory, some of you may be stumped by the “Me 109.” This refers to the Messerschmitt Bf 109 – a WW2-era Luftwaffe fighter plane which the watch is said to be inspired by. More specifically, it refers to a Junghans clock taken from the cockpit of one such plane. Two tangential points I’d like to make here: one, it’s rare that a brand openly recognizes and credits another as its muse; and two, is it just me or do British watchmaking brands have an obsession with aviation-themed limited edition timepieces?
Anyway, back to the subject at hand. The Christopher Ward C9 Me 109 Monopusher Chronograph is powered by the calibre JJ02. Based on a Unitas 6497, which is then heavily (and I mean quite heavily) modified to incorporate all the monopusher chronograph bits. This is the brainchild of Johannes Jahnke and Jean Fillon. The former was instrumental in developing the in-house calibre SH21 and the modules on various Christopher Ward watches and is now a part of Sellita, furthering its movement development efforts.
The calibre JJ02 was first used in the Ball Watches Price Replica C9 Single Pusher Chronograph, a dressier version than what we see here today. In my opinion, the Me 109 iteration looks much cooler and is better suited to the large proportions of the watch. The JJ02 provides a 40h power reserve and beats at 18,800bph. Unlike the dressier sibling, which has a rather boring movement finish, the bridges on the C9 Me 109 movement are finished with a black PVD coating and have chamfering – giving it a very nice, edgy monochromatic look that I really like.
Since the debut of their earliest watches back in 2005, Ball Watches 2017 Replica has been making great strides to supply diversity, function, and quality in the products they create. In the heart of their line-up is the Trident collection, a family of watches which has grown to include a seemingly never-ending selection of sailors, GMTs, and chronograph watches. Quite honestly, it is a bit nauseating to actually try and maintain but at least, in my mind, the Trident will probably always be a dive watch and one which has gone the distance for Christopher Ward. This summer, the brand introduced the Christopher Ward C60 Trident Day Date COSC, a limited edition diver that’s about as back-to-basics as you can get when thinking about some of the current versions in Christopher Ward’s catalog. But, with 2017 pretty much reputation as the year of the dive watch, should you really care everything much?Right today, the majority of you are likely making your way through this review without giving it much thought. Some of you might just be skipping through it, possibly glancing at the photos and not reading this part. You might not even know how you got here — the world wide web is a weird place, I get it. However, a lot of you (I know you are out there) can not wait to tell us about how much you despise the newest Christopher Ward emblem and you may even have some of your best memes locked and loaded for the comments section. Well, fear not. We’ll get to this in a bit but for the time being, I must say that overall, I’ve loved my time with the Christopher Ward C60 Trident Day Date COSC and believe there is a great deal of value to think about here.
At 43mm by 15.7mm, this is not a small watch – but when it comes to chronographs, there is a tradeoff between affordability and movement sizes. It would be cost prohibitive to develop a new one from scratch and existing options (7750, ETA 2894-2, or the Eterna 39A with module) are all of similar thickness. See why I like this watch better as a pilot watch than a dress watch now?
The case is DLC steel with a sandblasted finish and has a large, ergonomic fluted crown. Naturally, there is sapphire crystal on both sides, with AR coating. The lack of a bezel leads me to believe this watch will wear larger than its 43mm size. The dial is a pretty familiar bi-compax layout with the running seconds counter at 9:00 and 30-min chrono counter at 3:00. Props to Christopher Ward for not including a date display on the watch.
The brand says that the design of the hands was based on the Junghans clock mentioned earlier, and while it isn’t the most elegant, it affords plenty of legibility and fits in with the tool watch theme. The minute ring, hour markers, and hands have Super-LumiNova that is colored to look like patinated lume in daylight – it suits the watch well, but you’re not likely to confuse this for a vintage timepiece from afar for sure.
The Christopher Ward C9 Me 109 Single Pusher Chronograph is an interesting alternative in a market flooded with 7750 and ETA 2894-2 powered watches. That’s no knock against either of those movements, but quite frankly, they don’t offer the same caseback view that this does. The thickness of the watch may deter some people, but for those who can pull it off, at a price of $3,370, and a limited run of 100 watches only, it appears to be a very good value proposition. christopherward.com